RSPCA NSW – working with rescue groups or not???

a) Steve Coleman, RSPCA NSW CEO, SMH,  RSPCA criticised.…9/10/12: “…….. rejected claims the RSPCA was unwilling to collaborate with other animal welfare organisations, adding that “discussions have been undertaken, and continue to be undertaken, with a number of community-based rescue groups”.

b) Letter sent to a NSW Member of Parliament

“I belong to a group of volunteers who rescue Alaskan Malamutes in NSW, Victoria and South Australia. We also assist in rehoming Australia wide. We are a deductible gift recipient with charity status, have public liability insurance, and all have our own malamutes www.amraa.org.au or facebook – Alaskan malamute Rehoming Aid. We have rescued over 100 Alaskan Malamutes in the last 2 ½ years in NSW alone of which 99% have been successfully rehomed.

Only one dog has been euthenased due to temperament issues and only one has not been rescued from the pound, due to issues with temperament. Otherwise we have taken all the dogs that we have been aware of in pounds – so we do not pick and choose. We enjoy a good relationship with the Animal Welfare League and many of the pounds around NSW. Our relationship with the RSPCA has been variable.

I am aware of their constraints as a large organisation, however, as a group that has animal advocacy as part of their mission statement, it is distressing that the Rutherford shelter in Newcastle has lacked any desire to allow breed specific rescue to rescue dogs. We are not the only group to find this. (DRP in bold highlight)

There have been 2 recent incidents that have been particularly distressing. There are others, but unfortunately there is a certain amount of secrecy involved in what happens to dogs after they go into care that makes it impossible to get details.

The first incident – 14/7/2012. Diesel a 5 yo Alaskan Malamute was surrendered to Rutherford shelter– unfortunately we were not made aware until a week later by the owner by which time it was too late – Diesel was euthenased 3 days after being surrendered for being dog aggressive. He was a gorgeous boy that I knew personally and was brought up with children. He was fabulous with all people but could be selective with his doggie companions, a trait that is common to many Alaskan malamutes, particularly if they are of the same sex. People are the same and can like certain individuals and not others, dogs are not given the same luxury at the RSPCA.

I would argue that the Rutherford shelter did not give him time to settle into a new and distressing environment before making the decision. Unfortunately, Malamutes in a kennel environment, can be aggressive to other dogs, particularly if tested with dogs of the same sex. It is a known trait of the breed. I challenge that a formal assessment was done. I know of a number of other malamutes that have been surrendered to this shelter and have not appeared for adoption and I would be interested to see statistics for the percentage of malamutes that are rehomed from the RSPCA after surrender. It would be interesting to see the numbers of malamutes rehomed as a percentage surrendered at this shelter, I suspect it is negligible and may indicate a bias against the breed.

The second incident – 22nd August, same shelter. We were made aware of an 18 month old male who had been surrendered. We were informed by an interested member of the public who was unable to get the owner to reclaim and wanted us to intervene as the dog was a lovely animal that had not been treated well.  On this occasion, we informed the shelter we were aware of the dog and wished to intervene and rescue if he failed temperament assessment on dog aggression. As way of explanation an 18 month old malamute is a teenager in the middle of his testosterone surge and will challenge any male dog and again, it is not surprising, he failed his temperament assessment on dog aggression. Despite offering to take full responsibility and trying to educate the shelter manager on breed traits, we, as a breed specific rescue were refused. So he too was euthenased.

We have rescued a number of dogs from other RSPCA shelters that have failed dog to dog assessment and have successfully rehomed all of them. They are now well behaved doggie citizens and able to be taken to dog parks even though they were tested as dog aggressive and failed assessments at the RSPCA. We do not wish to rescue dogs that are not able to be rehomed due to any form of human aggression, but in the right home with knowledgeable owners, these dogs make fabulous companions and are not a threat to society.

Steve Coleman has contacted me and has said that consistency with dealing with rescues was being looked at. I am writing to ensure this doesn’t get brushed under the table. If we can’t stop back yard breeding, puppy farmers and idiot owners, can the rescue organisations that understand the breed and can at least rehome appropriately, be given a chance to rescue these magnificent animals and be treated with some respect to assist organisations, such as the RSPCA, to do so?

We can only make their life easier by taking dogs they consider to be difficult and requiring special types of homes. I would guarantee that we know and understand a lot more about Alaskan Malamutes than many of the shelter staff or behaviourists doing assessments and can be far more selective in our rehoming.”

DRP Comment: conflicting information….???

Action you can take: 

Email Steve Coleman and ask him specifically which Rescue Groups RSPCA NSW work with : scoleman@rspcansw.org.au; it’s a fair question.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “RSPCA NSW – working with rescue groups or not???

  1. Carol Cornish October 10, 2012 / 3:20 am

    I just emailed Mr Steve Coleman and I truly hope I receive a reply.

    And I will never again donate one cent of my money to the RSPCA..

    With such a high kill rate, considering the amount of profit they made last financial year, they certainly have the money to fix this problem.

    I was always led to believe the RSPCA was there for all creatures great and small, but now I feel they are there to kill, not care!!!

  2. Tess October 10, 2012 / 7:31 am

    I also won’t donate to the RSPCA until they start spending some of the millions of dollars they receive in donations to save more lives. They need to spend the money they use on self-promotion on a “desex your pets” campaign and subsidised desexing program. And require all branches in all states to release animals to rescue groups. And advertise all their animals online. They have lots of money so I want to see them start to use it.

  3. Tess October 10, 2012 / 7:33 am

    Hey Steve Coleman. “DISCUSSIONS” with rescue groups are not enough! We want to see some real actions! This has been an issue for years so there is no excuse not to be releasing animals to rescue groups now. And by the way, there are no “discussions” happening either.

  4. Annelies Craig October 10, 2012 / 1:20 pm

    I honestly hope that there is a common sense decision made in regards to the relevant points made by the representative from Alaskan Malamute Rescue, in that dogs that the RSPCA deem unhomeable or ‘failing temperament tests’…that these specific breed of dogs get passed onto these rescue organisation that re home this certain type of breed. It makes sense to me, they know the breed, know what is expected of them and know how to correct any habits that need be. We are after all, trying to save as many lives as possible and we need to work together in achieving this. I expect this to go right across the board as there are so many great rescue organisations out there that deal specifically with a certain type of breed and they should be utilised based on their knowledge alone.

  5. Carol Cornish October 10, 2012 / 1:29 pm

    I so agree 1000000%.

    We all want to help animals not kill them.

  6. companionanimalnews October 10, 2012 / 8:52 pm

    Info received from Hunter Animal Watch, who do sterling desexing work:

    “…., a couple of years ago we offered to go in a joint venture with them for Hunter Animal Watch to subsidise desexing in an area chosen by the RS for a limited length of time. It was a good offer, and they would have got very good press from it. Guess what happened? Nothing. They are either unwilling or unable to work well with others.”

  7. susan green October 13, 2012 / 7:29 pm

    Come on, a least give these dogs a chance to be rehomed. Get on to the backyard breeders. I am not going to donate money to the rspca when you hear thing like this, at least do something to help these dog.

  8. Carol Cornish October 15, 2012 / 4:09 am

    Yes Susan. That’s right. Stop the puppy mills to start with an enforce that ANYONE wanting to own/purchase a dog or cat must hold a special license. Minimize the population of these animals being born so there is control.

    I also will not be donating one cent of my money to RSPCA as I have done for years

    My help now goes to Dog Rescue Newcastle. The ones who care about these beautiful loyal animals. Unlike the RSPCA with their 10 million profit they made in one year. At least the RSPCA Could work much more closely with daily communication with all the willing and wanting Rescue Organisations available.

    Minimize the death toll by working as a team am sure is not hard to do. All vets all over Australia should really join in and do really cheap micro chipping animals and desexing as their part To help reduce the kill rate of dogs and cats. Vets are supposed to love animals …so…. Help your local community.

    Finally – Bring on OSCARS LAW !!!

  9. Kaye November 28, 2012 / 5:41 am

    The CEO told a previous employee he HATED cats & more so those abandoned he refers to as feral. I was raided on his instruction my 22 pedigree cats some imported young & older and healthy were all euthanased on CEO Steve coleman & Chief Inspector David O’Shannesy command. RSPCA DO NOT work with any voluntary rescue groups. They have millions in the bank & only adopt a few dogs & cats. They are closed on Wednesdays why to murder animals on death row & incinerate their little bodies. Shame on the RSPCA money grabbing lot. Just money for BIG salaries. If only the general public could see through them and start giving their donations to honest No Kill rescue groups who rehome abandoned stray surrendered and dogs & cats on death row at all RSPCA and council shelters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s